Tag Archives | Plant Classification

Merits and Demerits of Thorne’s System

In this article we will discuss about the merits and demerits of Throne’s system. Merits of Thorne's System: 1. The woody Annonales which are now universally accepted as the most primitive living Angiosperms are the starting point of his system and constitute the base of the phylogenetic shrub of Angiosperms. The Berberidaceae and the Nymphaeales, though more advanced than the [...]

By |2016-08-30T17:16:31+00:00August 30, 2016|Plant Classification|Comments Off on Merits and Demerits of Thorne’s System

Bentham and Hooker System: Merits and Demerits

In this article we will discuss about the merits and demerits of Bentham and Hooker's system. Merits of Bentham and Hooker's System: 1. The description of families and genera is very accurate. 2. The system is very handy for identification purposes. 3. The system is of great practical convenience. The British and Commonwealth herbaria therefore still adopt this system in [...]

By |2016-08-30T17:16:31+00:00August 30, 2016|Plant Classification|Comments Off on Bentham and Hooker System: Merits and Demerits

Swingle’s Principles for Plant Classification

The following points highlight the thirty-six important Swingle’s principles for plant classification. Swingle’s Principle # 1. Plant relationships are up and down genetic lines and these must constitute the framework of phylogenetic taxonomy. Swingle’s Principle # 2. Some evolutionary processes are progressive while others are regressive. Swingle’s Principle # 3. Evolution does not necessarily involve all organs of the plant [...]

By |2016-08-30T17:16:31+00:00August 30, 2016|Plant Taxonomy|Comments Off on Swingle’s Principles for Plant Classification
Go to Top